The admission of a partner is one of the most tested and most misunderstood topics in partnership accounts. The moment a new partner walks in, three things change at once: the profit-sharing ratio shifts, goodwill has to be settled fairly, and the firm's assets and liabilities are revalued at today's worth. Miss any one of them and your capital accounts will not balance. This guide walks you through all three — the new and sacrificing ratio, the premium method for goodwill, and the revaluation account — and then ties them together in one fully worked example you can follow line by line.
What Really Changes When a Partner Is Admitted
When a new partner joins an existing firm, the business carries on, but the agreement that governed it does not. Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, an incoming partner can be admitted only with the consent of all existing partners. The accounting consequences flow from a single idea: the new partner is buying a share of future profits, and that share has to come out of someone else's slice.
That is why the admission of a partner always triggers the same cluster of adjustments. The old partners give up part of their profit share, so the ratio is recalculated. The incoming partner has to compensate them for the firm's reputation, so goodwill is settled. And because the new partner's capital is going in at current values, the assets and liabilities are restated to what they are actually worth today — not the historical figures sitting in the old balance sheet.
There is also a practical reason the firm bothers with all this at the point of admission rather than later. Capital accounts are the ledger of who owns what, and a new partner is about to sit alongside the old ones. If goodwill is not settled and assets are not revalued before C's capital goes in, the old partners quietly hand C a share of value they built and gains they earned — with no way to claw it back once the share is granted. Doing the adjustments up front keeps each partner's capital account honest about what they actually brought to the table.
Think of it as a reset of the partnership's financial agreement rather than the start of a brand-new business. The books continue; the arithmetic underneath them is re-cut. If you can keep those three moving parts separate in your head — ratio, goodwill, revaluation — the rest is mechanical. If you want this foundation built properly rather than pieced together from scattered videos, a structured accounting program compresses months of trial and error into a few focused weeks.
How to Calculate the New and Sacrificing Ratio
Everything in an admission question starts with the ratio, because the goodwill split later depends on it. There are two ratios you must never confuse: the new profit-sharing ratio and the sacrificing ratio.
The new profit-sharing ratio
The new ratio tells you how profits will be divided once the new partner is in. Suppose A and B share profits 3:2 and admit C for a one-fourth share. C takes 1/4, so the old partners are left with 3/4 of the firm, which they continue to divide between themselves in their old 3:2 ratio. That gives A nine-twentieths and B six-twentieths, with C on five-twentieths — a new ratio of 9:6:5.
Admitting C for a one-fourth share resets the profit split to 9:6:5
Illustrative worked example.
The sacrificing ratio
The sacrificing ratio measures how much each old partner gave up so the new partner could come in. The formula is simple: sacrificing ratio = old share − new share. A had 12/20 and now has 9/20, a sacrifice of 3/20. B had 8/20 and now has 6/20, a sacrifice of 2/20. So A and B sacrifice in the ratio 3:2.
Notice that here the sacrificing ratio equals the old ratio, because C's share was carved out of the old partners proportionately. That is not always the case. If the new partner acquires a specific fraction from each old partner, or if the old partners agree a different surrender, the sacrificing ratio will diverge from the old ratio — and the whole goodwill split rides on getting it right. This is where most marks are lost: students default to the old ratio out of habit instead of actually subtracting.
Goodwill on Admission: the Premium Method
Goodwill is the value of the firm's reputation — the profit it earns above a normal return. The incoming partner is going to enjoy a share of that reputation from day one without having built it, so they must compensate the partners who did. Under the current treatment aligned with Accounting Standard 26, goodwill is not raised and kept in the books on admission. Instead, the new partner brings in a premium for goodwill, and that premium is handed to the sacrificing partners. We explained how the asset itself is measured in our guide to goodwill in accounting, so here we focus only on how it is settled.
When the premium is brought in cash, you pass two entries. First, the cash arrives: debit Bank, credit Premium for Goodwill. Second, the premium is distributed: debit Premium for Goodwill, credit the sacrificing partners' capital accounts — crucially, in the sacrificing ratio, not the new ratio. This single point is the most common trap in the whole topic.
The ₹60,000 goodwill premium follows the sacrificing ratio (3:2), not the new ratio
Illustrative worked example.
Two variations are worth knowing. If the incoming partner does not bring the premium in cash, the amount due is adjusted through their capital or current account and credited to the sacrificing partners in the sacrificing ratio — the compensation still happens, just on paper rather than in the bank. And if goodwill already appears in the old balance sheet, it must be written off first, among the old partners in their old ratio, before you record any premium. Carrying forward an old self-generated goodwill figure is not permitted; AS 26 only recognises goodwill that has been paid for.
Want to pass these entries with confidence under exam pressure?
NIFM's online accounting training breaks partnership reconstitution into step-by-step video lessons and practice problems, in Hindi and English, with a certificate on passing the course assessment.
Explore the ACCA Knowledge Level accounting course →Revaluation of Assets and Liabilities
The old balance sheet carries assets at historical values that may no longer be true. Before the new partner's capital goes in, the firm restates them through a Revaluation Account (sometimes called the Profit and Loss Adjustment Account). The logic is fairness: any gain or loss from these restatements belongs to the old partners, because it accrued before the new partner arrived. So the net result of revaluation is shared among the old partners in their old ratio only.
The direction of each entry follows one rule: anything that increases the firm's net worth is a gain (credited to Revaluation), and anything that decreases it is a loss (debited to Revaluation). The table below is the whole topic on one page. The same debit-and-credit discipline underpins everyday adjustments too, such as the ones we cover in fixed asset disposal journal entries.
| Change at revaluation | Journal entry | Effect on old partners |
|---|---|---|
| Asset value increases ↑ | Asset A/c Dr — To Revaluation A/c | ✓ Gain |
| Asset value decreases ↓ | Revaluation A/c Dr — To Asset A/c | ✗ Loss |
| Liability increases ↑ (or new provision) | Revaluation A/c Dr — To Liability/Provision A/c | ✗ Loss |
| Liability decreases ↓ (or provision no longer needed) | Liability A/c Dr — To Revaluation A/c | ✓ Gain |
| Net profit (or loss) on revaluation | Revaluation A/c Dr — To Old Partners' Capital A/cs | Shared in old ratio |
Rule: net worth up = gain (credit Revaluation); net worth down = loss (debit Revaluation).
One subtlety worth remembering: when a provision for doubtful debts is created at revaluation, it reduces the realisable value of debtors, so it is a loss — debit Revaluation. If an existing provision is found to be excessive and written back, that is a gain. Always ask what the change does to net worth, and the direction of the entry answers itself.
One Fully Worked Example, Start to Finish
Let us bring the three strands together. A and B share profits 3:2. They admit C for a one-fourth share. C brings in ₹2,00,000 as capital and ₹60,000 as premium for goodwill in cash. On revaluation, stock is found undervalued by ₹10,000, machinery is reduced by ₹4,000, and a provision for doubtful debts of ₹2,000 is created. The entries always run in the same sequence — get the order right and the capital accounts fall into place on their own.
Step 1 — New ratio: C takes 1/4; A and B keep 3/4 in 3:2, giving 9/20 and 6/20. New ratio 9:6:5.
Step 2 — Sacrificing ratio: A sacrifices 12/20 − 9/20 = 3/20; B sacrifices 8/20 − 6/20 = 2/20. Sacrificing ratio 3:2.
Step 3 — Goodwill premium: The ₹60,000 premium is split 3:2, so A gets ₹36,000 and B gets ₹24,000. Step 4 restates the assets through the Revaluation Account, and the net gain goes to A and B in 3:2. The journal entries below show the full set.
| Particulars | Dr (₹) | Cr (₹) |
|---|---|---|
| Bank A/c Dr To C's Capital A/c To Premium for Goodwill A/c (Capital and premium brought in by C) | 2,60,000 | 2,00,000 60,000 |
| Premium for Goodwill A/c Dr To A's Capital A/c To B's Capital A/c (Premium shared in sacrificing ratio 3:2) | 60,000 | 36,000 24,000 |
| Stock A/c Dr To Revaluation A/c (Stock revalued upward) | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| Revaluation A/c Dr To Machinery A/c To Provision for Doubtful Debts A/c (Machinery reduced; provision created) | 6,000 | 4,000 2,000 |
| Revaluation A/c Dr To A's Capital A/c To B's Capital A/c (Net revaluation profit ₹4,000 shared 3:2) | 4,000 | 2,400 1,600 |
Read the revaluation block as one story: a ₹10,000 gain on stock, less a ₹4,000 fall in machinery and a ₹2,000 new provision, leaves a net profit of ₹4,000, which belongs to A and B alone in their old 3:2 ratio. C neither gains nor loses from the revaluation, which is exactly the point — those changes happened on the old partners' watch. If the debit-and-credit mechanics feel shaky, our refresher on the golden rules of accounting is the quickest way to re-anchor them.
Common Mistakes and What to Do Next
Four errors cost the most marks in the admission of a partner. First, distributing the goodwill premium in the new ratio instead of the sacrificing ratio. Second, sharing the revaluation profit with the incoming partner, who is not entitled to it. Third, forgetting to write off any goodwill already standing in the old books before recording the premium. Fourth, defaulting to the old ratio as the sacrificing ratio without actually subtracting new from old — fine in our example, wrong the moment the surrender is unequal.
The cure is always the same: work in the fixed order — ratio, then goodwill, then revaluation, then capitals — and ask of every entry whether it touches the old partners only or all partners. Get that habit in place and partnership reconstitution stops being intimidating and becomes one of the most reliable scoring areas in the paper.
Learn partnership accounts the structured way
Trusted by 50,000+ learners since 2012 · Hindi + English · Learn at your own pace
Start the ACCA Knowledge Level accounting courseFrequently Asked Questions
What is the sacrificing ratio in the admission of a partner?
The sacrificing ratio is the share of future profit each existing partner gives up so a new partner can be admitted. It is calculated as old share minus new share for each partner. It matters because the incoming partner's goodwill premium is distributed to the old partners in this ratio, not in the new profit-sharing ratio.
Why is goodwill not raised in the books on admission?
Accounting Standard 26 only recognises purchased goodwill, not self-generated goodwill. So on admission the firm does not create a goodwill asset. Instead, the incoming partner brings a premium for goodwill in cash, which is credited to the sacrificing partners. If any goodwill already appears in the books, it is written off among the old partners in their old ratio first.
Who gets the profit or loss on revaluation?
Only the old partners, in their old profit-sharing ratio. Revaluation reflects changes in asset and liability values that built up before the new partner joined, so the gain or loss is theirs alone. The incoming partner is deliberately kept out of the revaluation result.
How is the new profit-sharing ratio calculated when a partner is admitted?
Give the new partner their agreed share first, then divide the balance among the old partners in their existing ratio, unless the question specifies a different surrender. In our example, C took 1/4, leaving 3/4 for A and B in 3:2, which produced a 9:6:5 new ratio.
What is the difference between the premium method and raising goodwill?
Under the premium method the incoming partner compensates the sacrificing partners directly, and no goodwill stays in the books, which is the AS 26-aligned treatment. The older method of raising goodwill created a goodwill account in the balance sheet. The premium method is now standard in Indian partnership accounts.
In what order should the admission entries be passed?
Work in a fixed sequence: first fix the new profit-sharing ratio, then the sacrificing ratio, then record the goodwill premium, then pass the revaluation entries, and finally adjust the capital accounts. Following the same order every time prevents the two most common errors — using the wrong ratio for goodwill and letting the new partner share in revaluation gains that are not theirs.
.jpg)
.jpg)




-%E2%80%93-full-preparation-strategy-for-high-marks.png)


.jpg)










.jpg)










